Connecticut Trial Court Official Decisions
MORRISON v. MORRISON, No. FA 05-4013170 (10-11-2006) EARL
G. MORRISON v. MERVALYN MORRISON. 2006 Ct. Sup. 18407 No.
FA 05-4013170 Connecticut Superior Court Judicial District
of Hartford at Hartford October 11, 2006
[EDITOR’S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the
issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION RE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
CONSTANCE L. EPSTEIN, JUDGE.
Plaintiff’s motion for articulation is granted in part and
the court herewith provides the following addition:
Mr. Morrison’s responsibility for utilities or services for
the home is to end as of the date of the court’s
To the extent not addressed above, the motion for
articulation is denied.
As to the division of property, all items on the
handwritten list, including those marked “no,” are to be
made available to Mr. Morrison, if they have not already
been made available.
As to the typed list of 8-29-06, Mr. Morrison is to
the leather recliner in the living room
the living room center table and the love seat or
the two office chairs in the computer room
the extra set of drapes, the extra set of blankets and
If the parties cannot agree on a time and place for
transfer, the transfer is to take place on Saturday,
October 21, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. CT Page 18408